Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mar Mon 10, 2008 11:09 pm
by t53a
i agree with Joe, i both love it and hate it. i can see alot of mk1 styling in the new rocco but its still not what the mk1 was about. The mk1 rocco was an over sized street legal go-cart, yet the new rocco is more of a family weekend car.
found this
Posted: Mar Mon 10, 2008 11:15 pm
by t53a
also found this pic, looks good from the front
Posted: Mar Mon 10, 2008 11:50 pm
by Roadhog
that second picture is the old design, way different.
Posted: Mar Tue 11, 2008 8:33 am
by ValveFloat
Yea, that green one is the concept car, which like the production car doesn't really fit as a Scirroco, but IMO its a cool looking car.
Posted: Mar Tue 11, 2008 11:57 am
by t53a
fyi they only changed the grill/front bumper from the concept to the production version
Posted: Mar Tue 11, 2008 12:03 pm
by Ramrod
I think I need to see it in person and drive it before I can really decide. It looks like it could be a fun car, but who knows.
Posted: Mar Tue 11, 2008 7:59 pm
by Ramrod
This looks like rediculous fun. I want my own big wet skid pad. Is that too much to ask?
[youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgArKxp1Rgs[/youtube]
And I still can't decide why this car looks so much more bad ass. Green paint? Black roof? Wheels? Grill?
Posted: Mar Tue 11, 2008 8:59 pm
by Rennwagen1
I am sure it has to do with camera angles and distance, but did anyone else notice that the car never seemed to get wet? Even when it was throwing spray all over the place. Maybe that is the magic of the new IROC. It never needs washing. In that case, I would buy one.
Posted: Mar Thu 13, 2008 10:40 pm
by Roadhog