so i just got on here after forever because im planning on gettin another vw and still own my jetta but its currently in my garage not moving because of crappy battery cables and no tags/insurance. so at the end of december i am moving back to huntley and help my grandma out so i won't have rent and can pick up a new car and i was thinking about getting a gti but i don't know wat model to get the vr6 or the 1.8t i know if i got the vr6 it would have to be the 24v instead of the 12v. but i do want to get a 1.8 but i need some advice on which one i should get. i know you guys know a lot about these cars and so do i but i just need a second opinion from some vw guys like me. thanks
Joel
Back 2 Bigsky forum
Moderator: Mikewire
- VWJET00
- Kicking the tires...
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Nov Thu 08, 2007 2:26 pm
- Location: Billings, MT
- Contact:
Back 2 Bigsky forum
~VR6JET~
- Rennwagen1
- The Dubfather
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Nov Mon 06, 2006 5:21 pm
- Vehicles: 84 GTI, 97 GLX, 04 Touareg V6
- Location: ZooTown Represent!
Re: Back 2 Bigsky forum
If you go 1.8T you want 2002 or newer, that is when they went to 180hp, and the 24V Vr is like 201 I think, so I would go with that also, but it al depends on what they are asking for them. Personally(and as a VR6 owner) I would go with a 1.8T as the tuning possiblilties are endless....
Jd3 wrote:Once again I was slangin rocks and pimpin bitches. Got a degree from the streets. Listen to the song regulate by warren g. I wrote it.
Captain Pajama SharkMikeWire wrote:Vanilla Ice > Depeche Mode.
99% Awesome 100% of the time!!
1.8/2.8/3.2 OEM+
You can pay for school, but you can't buy class!

- ValveFloat
- Moderator
- Posts: 730
- Joined: Mar Thu 02, 2006 8:48 pm
- Vehicles: 1991 911
2003 Ducati M620 - Location: Bozeman
Re: Back 2 Bigsky forum
Renn makes a good point. Depends what your plan with for the car is. If modding and tuning are what you really want to do, the 1.8T has more potential for gains.
On the other hand, if your going to pretty much drive it as is, the VR makes more power out of the box, and the delivery is much more usable than the turbo. Having driven both, I prefer the instant response of a VR6.
On the other hand, if your going to pretty much drive it as is, the VR makes more power out of the box, and the delivery is much more usable than the turbo. Having driven both, I prefer the instant response of a VR6.
-Joe
My cars
My cars
- Rennwagen1
- The Dubfather
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Nov Mon 06, 2006 5:21 pm
- Vehicles: 84 GTI, 97 GLX, 04 Touareg V6
- Location: ZooTown Represent!
Re: Back 2 Bigsky forum
I agree with Joe also, I mean, don't get me wrong, I love my VR6, nothing sounds like a strung out VR with intake and exhaust screaming up a pass. Nothing. BUT you reach a point of dimishing returns on a VR very quickly. As much as I love my VR, I am pretty sure that my next "project" will be a 1.8T. Again, Joe has it right;
Heavy tuning: 1.8T
Not so much Tuning:VR6
Choose wisely.
Heavy tuning: 1.8T
Not so much Tuning:VR6
Choose wisely.
Jd3 wrote:Once again I was slangin rocks and pimpin bitches. Got a degree from the streets. Listen to the song regulate by warren g. I wrote it.
Captain Pajama SharkMikeWire wrote:Vanilla Ice > Depeche Mode.
99% Awesome 100% of the time!!
1.8/2.8/3.2 OEM+
You can pay for school, but you can't buy class!

- Dubber
- In the drivers seat...
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Apr Thu 17, 2008 2:13 pm
- Vehicles: 2009 Skoda Octavia Ambiente II
- Location: Prague, Czech Republic
- Contact:
Re: Back 2 Bigsky forum
I would also agree with both joe and aeron, i have a 1.8t and i absolutely love it, but i would rather a VR6 since i am not planning on going crazy on the mods, having instant power without having to wait for the turbo (very short time i know) is really nice. but, i like the fuel economy which, if i am correct(not sure), is a little better on the 1.8 i think, either one thats within your price range would be a good way to go.
i do have mine chipped, so id imagine i would be able to keep with a VR6 and if your worried about the extra 20 hp the VR6 has, the chip was a great way to nearly match that.
i do have mine chipped, so id imagine i would be able to keep with a VR6 and if your worried about the extra 20 hp the VR6 has, the chip was a great way to nearly match that.
"We are shaped by our thoughts; We become what we think. When the mind is pure, joy follows like a shadow that never leaves." - Buddha
If you are not happy now, you never will be.
If you are not happy now, you never will be.
- Rennwagen1
- The Dubfather
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Nov Mon 06, 2006 5:21 pm
- Vehicles: 84 GTI, 97 GLX, 04 Touareg V6
- Location: ZooTown Represent!
Re: Back 2 Bigsky forum
Mileage is another great point. I also believe the 1.8T is going to get better mileage, if you stay out of the boost. Boost = Fuel use. I get about 28.5 in my VR6 on the highway, and it would be better I think if I was not chipped, as it runs a little rich, but the power and driveablilty is well worth it. I have heard of the 1.8Ts getting upwards of 40 mpg if they are driven nicely.
Jd3 wrote:Once again I was slangin rocks and pimpin bitches. Got a degree from the streets. Listen to the song regulate by warren g. I wrote it.
Captain Pajama SharkMikeWire wrote:Vanilla Ice > Depeche Mode.
99% Awesome 100% of the time!!
1.8/2.8/3.2 OEM+
You can pay for school, but you can't buy class!

Re: Back 2 Bigsky forum
I get ~32mpg on the highway at 75MPH(4000rpms). With my new 5th gear I'm hoping to see 35+mpg highway.
- bigmontana
- Euro Addict!!!
- Posts: 1874
- Joined: Mar Sun 19, 2006 11:32 pm
- Vehicles: 1963 Beetle 2000 Mercedes E320 Wagon
- Location: Billings
Re: Back 2 Bigsky forum
I have driven both and I love my VR, and 1.8 do get better gas mileage. Mine varies.
1963 Beetle
2001 Passat 4moWagon (Sold)
2000 Mercedes E320 Wagon
2001 Passat 4moWagon (Sold)
2000 Mercedes E320 Wagon